Blog thumbnail

CRUG Lawyers Recognized as 2021 Super Lawyers and Ohio Rising Star

CRUG is pleased to announce 4 attorneys have been recognized on the 2021 Ohio Super Lawyers list and 1 named to Ohio Rising Stars.

Super Lawyers is an exclusive list, recognizing no more than five percent of attorneys in Ohio. Part of Thomson Reuters, Super Lawyers is a research-driven, peer influenced rating service of outstanding lawyers who have attained a high degree of peer recognition and professional achievement.

To be named a Super Lawyer or Rising Star, peer nominations are submitted, reviewed and researched, resulting in a points-based rating system.

The following 4 attorneys have been named a 2021 Ohio Super Lawyer and the 5th an Ohio Rising Star for Insurance Coverage (L-R): Kurt D. Anderson, Cleveland; Gregory H. Collins, Akron; Richard M. Garner, Columbus; David L. Lester, Cleveland; and Lucas P. Baker, Columbus.

Rich M. Garner
Blog thumbnail

COVID-19 Tolling

On Friday, March 27, 2020, the Supreme Court of Ohio, in conjunction with related legislative enactments, issued a sweeping tolling order of all Ohio state court deadlines between March 9, 2020 and July 30, 2020 (or the end of the COVID-19 emergency, if earlier). For more information, see the high court’s announcement below.

According to other web sources, Ohio’s actions are consistent with the actions of many other states and courts.


Blog thumbnail

CRUG Lawyers Listed in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020

Today we our pleased to announce that 6 CRUG attorneys have been recognized in The Best Lawyers in America© 2020 guide. In addition, Paul D. Eklund has been named a Best Lawyers 2020 “Lawyer of the Year,” a special distinction conferred upon a single lawyer within a practice area and metropolitan market.

Blog thumbnail

OACTA Amicus Win: Pelletier v. Campbell, Slip Opinion No. 2018-Ohio-2121

Congratulations to Kurt Anderson of Collins, Roche, Utley & Garner (OACTA Amicus counsel) and Greg Beck of Baker, Dublikar, Beck, Wiley & Matthews (counsel for City of Campbell) for their success in the Ohio Supreme Court.  The Court determined that the City of Campbell had no duty to remove foliage that may have obstructed a stop sign, but did not originate from the stop sign.

The Court applied R.C. 2744.02(B)(3) and determined, whether a stop sign is “in repair” depends on its physical condition, not whether it no longer serves its purpose due to an extraneous factor.  The duty to “remove obstructions from public roads” applies only to obstructions that originate on the public road and does not apply to conditions that are only near or in the vicinity of public roads.

Brief Decision




Blog thumbnail

Putting a Price on Value

Value is about more than price.  Value is qualitative as well as quantitative.  It is the “worth of something when compared to the price paid or asked for it.” 

Most of us are willing to spend time and energy to find value.  Why? Because while we don’t want to overpay for something, experience has made us painfully aware that just because something is less expensive doesn’t mean that it is a value.  You get what you pay for. 

Determining value is hard enough when we’re shopping for goods.  It is harder when we’re selecting services—and harder still when selecting professional services like choosing which litigation firm will represent you or your business partners or clients. 

From any client’s standpoint, litigation related expenses are simply negative cash flow.  This can create tension between lawyer and client because lawyers have a financial incentive to generate more expenses while clients have a competing financial incentive to minimize expenses. 

This dynamic has led clients who handle litigation as a business, like insurers, to:  (1) institute billing and litigation management guidelines; and (2) utilize a limited number of “panel” counsel to a handle large volume of cases pursuant to these billing and litigation management guidelines.  Such practices are designed to control litigation related expenses while still providing excellent legal representation to clients and their insureds through lawyers that have established relationships with the payers. 

At CRUG, years of experience have taught us that there must be more than adherence to billing and litigation management guidelines to effectively manage litigation related expenses.  Our lawyers partner with our clients to directly address a foundational element of litigation-related expenses—such expenses must be value based.  There must be a concerted and systematic effort by lawyer and client alike to:  quickly identify litigation drivers; formulate strategies and tactics to mitigate or neutralize those drivers; effectively implement such strategies and tactics to favorably resolve (or avoid) litigation as soon as possible and to repeat this process on an ongoing basis.  This type of enhanced relationship requires a degree of familiarity, trust and execution beyond simple compliance with guidelines in a single case

We have created the culture and business practices to add value to cases over and over.   Repeatability is vital to value—both temporally and geographically. 

From a temporal standpoint, our clients know that we can and will execute this approach on a consistent basis so that the expensive, time-consuming process of vetting new panel counsel or hiring scores of in-house lawyers can be minimized.  This means that our lawyers:  operate with maximum proficiency in their practice areas; are supported by a work force of a size that permits for continuity, including legacy planning, various levels of responsibility and appropriate teamwork; utilize technology and other resources to maximize efficiency; and are subject to metrics-based evaluation to verify added value.      

From a geographic standpoint, our clients know that we provide stable, high-quality legal representation throughout Ohio.  A client that manages litigation in Cleveland may manage litigation in Cincinnati as well.  CRUG provides our clients with the ability to utilize a single, geographically diverse firm of lawyers with a proven track record of performance which provides greater value than maintaining multiple law firms in multiple regions simply to have a “local” presence. 

In the end, the reward for our clients is value-added service.  Litigation related expenses that do not add value are minimized or eliminated, and those that add value are systemized and repeated in order to create efficiency and a better experience for clients and their business partners. The reward for our lawyers is obvious–a deeper level of trust from our clients which translates into deeper relationships and increased business. 

Not sure how it all works?  Be your own judge.  We invite you to experience the difference.